Security Blanket & Logic Lockdown
上一篇 /
下一篇 2006-07-17 18:01:16 / 天气: 晴朗
/ 心情: 高兴
/ 个人分类:FPGA Journal Study
原文见FPGAandStructuredASIC Journal
Part1 以及Part 2.
Two articles
from fpgajounal discussed the security of state-of-art ASIC and FPGA.The most
common theft mechanism hitting systems designer today is Overbuilding. Generally, there are two ways to steal the
design, reverse engineering, and cloning. In American law, reverse engineering
is allowed for some reason. So reverse engineering consulting company have a
lot of customers, who have two minds: semiconductor companies want to know how
their competitors’ products work and legal professionals want to prove that
their clients’ patents were infringed or that their devices were copied in
their entirety.
There are
different ways to avoid the thieves in ASIC and FPGA. In ASIC, reversing engineering
is popular in ASIC. But if you have an ASIC with 90ns ASIC with 10 layers of
metal and billion transistors, reverse engineering is non-sense.
As a
Manager, the MOST important decision is regarding how and ho much to protect
your design is economic.
In FPGA
area, the story is complicated. The configuration file of SRAM-based FPGA
(Xilinx and Altera) is stored in the external PROM, which is easy to steal and
re-generated to design file. The most common way of anti-theft is encryption.
The bitstream Is encrypted, and an encryption key programmed into the FPGA
device itself. Only an FPGA encoded with the correct encryption key can read
the encrypted bitstream. Xilinx and altera have different mechanism to encrypt.
(Check the second articles). Now, there are other type of FPGA which use more
safe way to protect the design. For instance, antifuse FPGAs from actel and
Quicklogic, and Flash FPGAS from Actel and Lattice and Altera’s Max II CPLD.
导入论坛
收藏
分享给好友
推荐到圈子
管理
举报
TAG:
security
安全保密